The decision raises Ms Zaghari-Ratcliffe’s incarceration from a consular to a state-to-state issue and will, says foreign secretary Jeremy Hunt, oblige “Iran to fulfil its obligations under international law”. It also opens the door for legal action with the possibility of compensation if it is proved that she had been mistreated.
On a broader basis, British diplomats making representations to Tehran on behalf of Ms Zaghari-Ratcliffe, who has dual British and Iranian nationality, will no longer be doing so on behalf of just an individual, but will be acting on behalf of the British state.
The offer of diplomatic protection is a “very rare move”, with the Foreign and Commonwealth Office in London saying “the UK has not used it in recent memory”, according to an official statement.
In offering Ms Zaghari-Ratcliffe this protection, the British government holds that the legal action brought against Ms Zaghari-Ratcliffe in Iran “ failed to meet Iran’s obligations under international standards” and that she “has periodically been denied access to the medical care recommended by doctors” despite assurances by the Iranian government.
Iranian officials insist that she is receiving the medical treatment necessary and that she has not suffered any abuse.
Ms Zaghari-Ratcliffe’s husband Richard, who has been campaigning in Britain for her release, has been told about the step being taken by the government. The couple have a three-year-old daughter being cared for by Ms Zaghari-Ratcliffe’s family in Tehran.
Mr Ratcliffe had in the past asked Boris Johnson, when he was foreign secretary, to declare diplomatic protection for his wife.
Any subsequent legal action taken would have to go through the International Court of Justice in The Hague. Senior diplomatic officials stressed, however, that no decision has been made about taking that path at this point.
Iran does not accept dual nationality and Tehran has repeatedly stated that Ms Zaghari-Ratcliffe is Iranian. Thus, they hold, she cannot be treated as a UK citizen, and the British government has no right to interfere with the country’s internal judicial process.
Mr Hunt acknowledged that diplomatic protection is “unlikely to be a magic wand that leads to an overnight result”, but “it demonstrates to the whole world that Nazanin is innocent and the UK will not stand by when one of its citizens is treated so unjustly”.
British government officials maintain that there is no connection between her case and that of Iran’s nuclear agreement with international powers – which Donald Trump is trying to tear up – but which Britain, along with France, Germany, Russia and China, the other signatories to the deal, is trying to preserve.
But it is hoped that France and Germany, along with other western states and the United Nations, will back the UK in taking robust steps to get Ms Zaghari-Ratcliffe freed.
Last October, Jose Antonio Guevara Bermdez, chair-rapporteur of the UN’s Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, and Asma Jahangir, special rapporteur on human rights for Iran, called for Ms Zaghari-Ratcliffe’s immediate release.
Ms Zaghari-Ratcliffe has been detained in Iran since 3 April 2016. In September that year she was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment for “plotting to topple the Iranian government”.
The prosecutor general in Tehran said that she was being held for running “a BBC Persian online journalism course which was aimed at recruiting and training people to spread propaganda against Iran”.
Ms Zaghari-Ratcliffe and her family vehemently deny the allegations.
The Independent
More about:
